Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs
- From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:08:39 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20100831120839.16172.qmail@7aace5add6b610.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20100430062857.GC6029@rivendell>
- References: <20100318201304.7496.qmail@167d09f4679c67.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20100415175858.19506.qmail@cf18e6e2a2ea50.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <n2pe9fb436d1004281320ha62d5699p8b9cee2a0fa66a11@mail.gmail.com> <20100428210837.11555.qmail@b585ea598a5fd2.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <m2ve9fb436d1004290824zb52e5701ob2b7db32f812181@mail.gmail.com> <20100429171528.GO16821@decadent.org.uk> <j2ze9fb436d1004291124s9fa86841z49404e1345929dc6@mail.gmail.com> <20100429192328.GB3883@rivendell> <x2qe9fb436d1004291246j2e6f00a7s2eef44b73b8bd3f6@mail.gmail.com> <20100430062857.GC6029@rivendell>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> [ It sucks to have to confirm mails for debian-package-dash@list.smarden.org ]
I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
that was additionally addressed to the <debian-ctte@lists.debian.org>
mailing list and got an automatic reply telling me that the mail cannot
be delivered because I'm not subscribed. Not a bounce, but an automatic
reply to the address in the From: header, not the envelope sender
address. How do you call this?
I'd be happy if it would've been a delivery notification giving me the
opportunity to easily confirm the mail to have it finally delivered,
and, as a bonus, all subsequent mails I send, without subscribing.
That's how the debian-package-dash@list.smarden.org works. And for
subscribers, mail is delivered immediately. You didn't subscribe.
With the <debian-ctte@lists.debian.org> mailing list, I now need to
guess whether the From: address needs to be subscribed or the envelope
sender address, subscribe with that address, re-send the message, losing
information about the cross-posting, and maybe do the same again if I
guessed the address wrong. I don't do that.
Regards, Gerrit.
Reply to: