On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 21:13:11 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Already uploaded to NEW. > That means either you uploaded too soon or ITPed too late. Nothing I can do about that. > xvba-video is the right source package name, the binary package is > named xvba-va-driver (same way as the nvidia VA driver: > vdpau-va-driver). vdpau-va-driver has Provides: nvidia-va-driver, s3g-va-driver, va-driver, vdpau-video and is in main. That doesn't sound nvidia-specific to me. > The package description already mentions, that it is ATI/AMD > specific. Users who want to activate this feature also know, that > the AMD implementation of VA is named xvba :) > "ATI/AMD specific" doesn't say anything about it requiring the use of the fglrx X driver. So yeah, the description needs to be improved as well. > I don't see any problems with that name. > I do. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature