On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:46:35AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Julien BLACHE (jblache@debian.org): > > Are there any reasons or objections against moving the ACL utilities to > > /bin, alongside their traditional UNIX counterparts? Note that libacl is > > already installed in /lib. > > If not, I'll file a bug against the acl package asking for the utilities > > to be moved to /bin. > The deep silence seems to prove that your suggestion is a good > idea..:-) > As far as I'm concerned, it would really be welcomed. What are the reasons *for* moving this to /bin? This doesn't appear to fit the definition of /bin. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature