[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: packages being essential but having stuff in /usr/?!

On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 19:22 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I believe this is a misunderstanding.  The quoted section do not mean
> that all files in a essential package need to be on the root
> partition, but that the package should always be installed.
Well but what's the benefit then at all? If it's not guaranteed to be

> This is the first time I hear someone read the policy section the way
> you do it, and I believe it is not representative for the intention
> behind that part of the policy.
At least to me it reads like that.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply to: