Re: xulrunner 1.9.2 into sid?
* Philipp Kern <email@example.com> [2010-06-28 11:55:22 CEST]:
> On 2010-06-28, Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> wrote:
> > If there is no manpower to do better than this then I feel that it would
> > be more honest to just use volatile.
> The catch-all for "I can't maintain this stuff properly" is not volatile,
> but backports. Thanks.
No it isn't, can you please stop disregarding backports in that way? If
you don't like it that's your fault - but calling it a dump place for
stuff that one can't maintain properly couldn't be further from reality.
>  No offence meant for the awesome mozilla maintainers.
But offence meant for the backports maintainers? Thanks for the fish.
"Lediglich 11 Prozent der Arbeitgeber sind der Meinung, dass jeder
Mensch auch ein Privatleben haben sollte."