On mer., 2010-05-26 at 08:29 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > It is not about whether dash can handle it or not. The bashisms
> don't come
> > from autoconf, the come from what the author's added to
> configure.in{,.in}.
>
> I beg to differ, at least some of them don't come from configure.*.
> One
> example is
> http://people.debian.org/~geissert/source-bashisms/evolution_2.30.1.2-2.dsc where I can't really fine the >&$3 call (nor any >& for that matter) in the configure.* files.
Ok, sorry, didn't see earlier in the thread that it was a false
positive.
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part