[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")



On moandei 24 Maaie 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> yes, keeping lilo in the
> archive is a burden for some other people (security team,

I would like to correct the suggestion that the security team would oppose 
keeping lilo in squeeze. There is currently no such objection, and in the past 
the security team has only voiced objections or asked for removal of packages 
with a security risk that is deemed significantly larger than average, for 
example based on past experience. That is not the case for lilo. The security 
team should not be used as an argument pro/contra lilo.



Cheers,
Thijs

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: