Re: Too much disruptive NMUs
Hi Jari (also Tony and Nobuhiro):
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 04:21:30PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
>
I am not going to answer you detailed to this email because you are trying
to explain you did nothing wrong and I agree you did nothing wrong
trying to fix bug and improve the quality in the archive.
My original email mentioning your upload and Nobuhiro's was adding an example,
then I cc'ed you since I was mentioning you, and your point of view about
this was interesting for the discussion.
About your mail I want to mention that what your consider minor changes
are not minor changes for other people as you can see in this thread.
And I want to highlight the idea that when you think a package is not
properly maintained then you (we) should force orphaning it. I am commenting
more about this in other thread.
If you think we should change the criteria about what is ok for a NMU or not,
please follow the thread in debian-qa.
I hope this mail explain my initial mail better and keep up the good work.
Ana
Reply to: