As far as I understood,... you guys are already starting to patch unrelated software just to make UPG work (see #581919). Even the title of that "bug", "bad ownership or modes..." is ridiculous... and proves what I've predicted before, namely that these changes will compromise security (such a patch will also affect non UPG systems). Nevertheless,... On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:04 -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote: > If you're using a non-UPG system, then you don't care. Debian is > UPG-based, so your argument is invalid. You actually, have to care... at least if #581919 is "solved". Cheers, Chris.
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature