[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: UPG and the default umask

As far as I understood,... you guys are already starting to patch
unrelated software just to make UPG work (see 

Even the title of that "bug", "bad ownership or modes..." is
ridiculous... and proves what I've predicted before, namely that these
changes will compromise security (such a patch will also affect non UPG


On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:04 -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> If you're using a non-UPG system, then you don't care. Debian is
> UPG-based, so your argument is invalid.
You actually, have to care... at least if #581919 is "solved".


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply to: