[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: UPG and the default umask

On Montag, 17. Mai 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> But I guess non of them wouldn't be received enthusiastically, would they?

you suggested something else in your previous mail...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: