Re: Bug#581729: [SQUEEZE] Document the umask change for new installs
On Sun, 16 May 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Also, I have not seen on -devel that the idea of having a different
> umask for system and regular users has been implemented in
> base-files yet. I propose to not mention this until base-files is
> updated to support it.
The file /etc/profile is only read for login shells, or shells that
pretend to be login shells.
Do we really have to make /etc/profile more complex to deal with
system users who login to the system?
Are there any? (other than root, who already has its Private Group).
Is it ok at all that a system user does a login to the system?
Reply to: