[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: UPG and the default umask

On Thu,13.May.10, 09:34:15, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2010-05-13, Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> wrote:
> > If no stronger objections against a change from 022 to 002 is raised, would you
> > agree changing base-files so that /etc/profile uses 002 on new systems?
> Doesn't that lead to "great fun" if you activate NIS or similar means
> to sync unix users and groups on such systems, if they aren't set up to
> use UPG too?  So that would need a big fat warning in the release notes
> and somehow I fear bad PR.  :P

How about a message on debian-security-announce ?

Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: