Re: snapshot.debian.org implications for you

To: Patrick Schoenfeld <schoenfeld@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: snapshot.debian.org implications for you
From: Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:02:34 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] AANLkTimOQWYU49N573em2XjmyPhs_GifhTG_qAaMD0pK@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100511075915.GA9887@moebius.credativ.lan>
References: <20100511072625.GA20447@intrepid.palfrader.org> <[🔎] 20100511075915.GA9887@moebius.credativ.lan>

Hi,

2010/5/11 Patrick Schoenfeld <schoenfeld@debian.org>:
>
> fair enough to request that responsibility from the maintainers.
> But wouldn't it be a less error-prove procedure to handle
> snapshot removals while processing RM bugs against ftp.d.o?

  Would not that remove distributable packages which no longer belong
to Debian archive?

Regards,
-- 
 Héctor Orón

"Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar
System, which one day will disconnect us."

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: snapshot.debian.org implications for you
  - From: Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva <marcot@debian.org>

References:
- Re: snapshot.debian.org implications for you
  - From: Patrick Schoenfeld <schoenfeld@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: snapshot.debian.org implications for you
Next by Date: Re: chromium-browser from experimental has included h.264 by default?
Previous by thread: Re: snapshot.debian.org implications for you
Next by thread: Re: snapshot.debian.org implications for you
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread