Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:54:41PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> > On dim., 2010-04-25 at 18:58 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > > What should we do?
> > >
> > > I think we should start using the new naming policy to add the
> > > -browserplugin suffix.
> > >
> > > There were some votes for -browserplugin and none against it. No
> > > better
> > > name was proposed. Therefore I think that it was decided.
> >
> > To be perfectly fair, browser-plugin-* had my vote, but anyway.
>
> We didn't discussed browser-plugin-*. Should we make a poll with
> *-browserplugin and browser-plugin-*?
I'd say usually namespaces in packages names are prefixes, so
browser-plugin-* would make sense.
Mike
Reply to: