Re: About new source formats for packages without patches
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: About new source formats for packages without patches
- From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 01:38:22 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20100401163822.GB11449@osamu.debian.net>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20100331130131.GA9849@jamessan.com>
- References: <87iq8f77pq.fsf@sonic.technologeek.org> <20100329105133.GD8939@rivendell> <87eij3754s.fsf@sonic.technologeek.org> <4BB21032.6050409@incase.de> <20100331061841.GF385@rivendell> <1270020137.3736.1.camel@tomoyo> <4BB30331.8080104@thykier.net> <20100331091830.GB1529@rivendell> <20100331114728.GA4007@osamu.debian.net> <20100331130131.GA9849@jamessan.com>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:01:31AM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:47:28PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:18:30AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > > That being said, I would (as it is now) actually prefer that it was
> > > > just a helper tool that from a VCS could derive a source package of
> > > > existing format. That would probably also increase the adoption rate,
> > > > since existing tools would work with those formats.
> > >
> > > The (theoretical) format that I gave as example was precisely this: it
> > > generates a "3.0 (quilt)" source package using a VCS repository as input.
> >
> > I guess what we should have is additional line in it or additional file
> > to record vcs used for packaging which will not interface with the basic
> > operation of other tools.
>
> You mean Vcs-* in debian/control?
I thought Raphael's idea on the (theoretical) format was a bit more than
recording VCS repository site but how VCS is used as imput to the packaging.
In any case, I am for not-adding too-much-complication if we can live
without them.
Osamu
Reply to: