[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#540215: Introduce dh_checksums

Harald Braumann <harry@unheit.net> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:32:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Having package.checksums be GPG-signed will take a significant change in
>> our infrastructure (buildd hosts, for instance, would need to have a way
>> to sign checksums files as well), so it's not going to happen
>> tomorrow.

That can be avoided by including a hash of the checksum file in the
Packages files. That would be a relatively minor change in


Reply to: