Re: dsniff is dead, long life to dsniff
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Luciano Bello <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The question is: should I package this new version as a replacement
> of the previous one, even one there is a big reduction in the feature
> list? Or, should I create a new package (let's say, python-dsniff) and
> RM dsniff?
As an occasional dsniff user, I'd rather keep the full (old) version
in Debian while the new one is incomplete.
If the new package is a Python module it'd be nice to have it also in
Debian in order to familiarize ourself with it, but IMHO the original
one should not be removed until the new one is full-featured.
Carlos Galisteo <cgalisteo AT k-rolus.net>
GPG keys & fingerprints:
0x8E0076E9 -> 939E 3D10 EAA2 A972 3AF2 E25C 26B7 D8E3 8E00 76E9
0x69ADBE65 > F888 6FBA 9145 B5A2 C187 66D6 5B8C 027A 69AD BE65