On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:51:20PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> We added a Lintian tag warning about not having md5sums in that time
> frame, I think.
Gotcha, that must be it. Very impressive result.
FWIW, about the people proposing to change from md5 to something else,
it should be pretty easy to achieve too: if all of us is using
dh_md5sums, it would be enough to change its implementation to store a
different kind of checksums (the name will become pretty bogus, though).
Russ, while we are at it, would you mind a bug report on the policy to
suggest (starting at SHOULD?) to store md5sums in packages?
Thanks,
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature