Re: md5sums files
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:34:27AM +0000, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2010-03-03, Neil Williams <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Changing to SHA won't help. I'm for ditching all md5sums from packages.
> > It's not a lot of disc space gained but it does give a false sense of
> > security or 'insurance' if you want to avoid the more formal meaning of
> > 'security'.
> Please don't. It's not about security. It's about being able to detect
> corruption. Also it is very helpful when recovering from ext4 root FS
> corruption after a sudden power loss. Sure, you cannot guarantee that
> the md5 store isn't corrupted too but if it isn't then debsums is
Very much agreed. Please do not remove the md5sums - even better, I'm
all for requiring md5sums (the cost to do so is, I think, insignificant)
because they are very helpful for the above purpose.