[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Misc developer news (#21)

On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 08:53 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:

> > The primary one I'm unhappy with is its deleting part of the upstream
> > tarball with (AFAIK) no warning and no control. (That is, if upstream
> > have a debian dir, it gets nuked, rather than us collaborating on it).
> That's a feature and an advantage in many situations. It really doesn't
> forbid you to reuse the upstream dir nor does it forbid you to collaborate
> with upstream to update it.

So how do you do that?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: