Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error
From: "Li, Yan" <yanli@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:22:00 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20091120092200.GA3555@thyme.bj.intel.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>, "Li, Yan" <yanli@infradead.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20091120083956.GA13523@glandium.org>

Mike:
> Why not put a lintian override ? Your explanation sounds like a good
> reason to me.

Thank you. I'm contacting Lintian maintainers.

-- 
Li, Yan

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error
  - From: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error
  - From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#557202: ITP: r-cran-diagnosismed -- GNU R Diagnostic test accuracy evaluation for medical professionals
Next by Date: Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error
Previous by thread: Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error
Next by thread: Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread