Re: DEP-5: binary package affected by license $foo

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: DEP-5: binary package affected by license $foo
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:24:14 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] e13a36b30911071824x139d158bwfcb12542141f8ba8@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20091107151906.GH10276@kunpuu.plessy.org>
References: <[🔎] 1257374872.4372.1325.camel@solid.paris.klabs.be> <[🔎] 20091107151906.GH10276@kunpuu.plessy.org>

On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> wrote:

> I think that we are still far from producing copyright files specific to binary
> packages

There are already copyright files in binary packages that are
different to the source package debian/copyright; some of the source
packages I've created contain debian/copyright and
debian/foo.copyright because parts of the source package are not used
in the binary package. It isn't much of a stretch to put
debian/copyright, debian/foo.copyright and debian/bar.copyright.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

References:
- DEP-5: binary package affected by license $foo
  - From: Frank Lin PIAT <fpiat@klabs.be>
- Re: DEP-5: binary package affected by license $foo
  - From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: common, FHS-compliant, default document root for the various web servers
Next by Date: Ways to indicate a string freeze
Previous by thread: Re: DEP-5: binary package affected by license $foo
Next by thread: Bug#554507: ITP: fjbtndrv -- Linux driver and tools for the tablet buttons of Fujitsu Tablet PCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread