On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:03:28 -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > I think gregor makes a good point, and that there can be a reasonable > compromise between the two worlds of "hey, let's just use URLs in the > Bug: field" and "no, I'm too lazy, we should just use a nubmer and > refer to the Debian BTS" Thanks for honouring my laziness :) > > Maybe I'm too lazy but I'd rather use > > Bug: #123456 > > Bug_CPAN: #12345 > Maybe an idea is to have a format like: > Bug: #123456 (assumes Debian BTS) > Bug: BTS#123456 (same as above, but explicit) > Bug: RT#123456 (to point to the CPAN Request Tracker) > Bug: http://blahblah Ack, and/but the original proposal has Bug-<Vendor> which seems reasonable to me, therefore I'd rather stick to Bug:, Bug-CPAN:, Bug-Gnome, ... > So you can use any of the above formats, either the short forms where > you have: SYSTEM#NUMBER or the full URL. Ack on either #number or URL. > And given previous fields I think Bug-CPAN is more appropriate than > Bug_CPAN (underscores are not used in Control fields from what I can > tell, like with Vcs-Browser for example) Sorry, that was a typo on my side. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x00F3CFE4, 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Queen: Heaven For Everyone
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature