Re: A standard patch rule for our rules
Rafael Almeida <almeidaraf@gmail.com> writes:
> A ``patch'' rule for debian/rules there should always be
> for I'd like to easily apply patches created by me
> Don't worry I don't think of anything too hard
> a simple standarization will ease my heart
>
> Today ``debian/rules build'' is always a good match
> but there's no mandatory ``debian/rules patch''
> Is the ``build'' rule mandatory? I don't even know
> it seems to work for most packages, though
Debian policy describes all the required targets and some optional
ones.
> Patches, it seems, are for ``configure'' rule to apply
> but I want to make a script and I think it won't fly
> That script I think of will install my own patches
> to any installable package, from zopes to apaches
>
> Configures can change too much
> like config.h files and such
> There should be one and only patch rule
> and then I'll be able to build my tool
man dpkg-source
Format: 3.0 (quilt)
A source package in this format contains at least an original tarball
(.orig.tar.ext where ext can be gz, bz2 and lzma) and a debian tarball
(.debian.tar.ext). It can also contain additional original tarballs
(.orig-component.tar.ext). component can only contain alphanumeric
characters and dashes ("-").
...
Behold the future is, aeh, soon.
MfG
Goswin
Reply to: