Le vendredi 19 juin 2009 à 11:03 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > I did not contact them yet. I expect that they will follow the outcome of > > this DEP otherwise they would have to patch lintian to support the > > differing field and it seems counter-productive. > > That sounds like a pretty bad way to force them to make changes to an > existing policy. It is just normal that such things happen given how the development process of Ubuntu works. When upstream implements something for which I have already a patch but in a different way, I’m not going to complain to them if I have not bothered earlier to forward my patch and discuss it with them so that it is integrated. The same reasoning applies here. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=