[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DEP 5 proposal omits original Debianization information



Deng Xiyue <manphiz-guest@users.alioth.debian.org> writes:

> [Don't know whether this has been asked.  If so, pointers are welcomed.]
>
> According to Debian Policy Manual section 12.5:
>
>     In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources
>     (if any) were obtained. *It should name the original authors of the
>     package and the Debian maintainer(s) who were involved with its
>     creation.*
>
> The current DEP 5 proposal doesn't provide a standard field dedicated
> for the information of original Debianizer, while the old format
> generated by dh-make does.  According to section 1.1,
>
>     In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources
>     (if any) were obtained. It should name the original authors of the
>     package and the Debian maintainer(s) who were involved with its
>     creation. 
>
> So this is not strictly required, but it is considered a bug, which AIUI
> needs fixing.  Hence I wonder how this was and will be handled.

Removing that part from Policy would be my preference.  It's duplication
of information that's already in the changelog.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


Reply to: