Re: Proposal to improve package configuration upgrades
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Proposal to improve package configuration upgrades
- From: Dominique Dumont <dominique.dumont@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:40:20 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] kgibprqj2mj.fsf@komarr.gre.hp.com>
- In-reply-to: <20090226153641.GA10523@usha.takhisis.invalid> (Stefano Zacchiroli's message of "Thu\, 26 Feb 2009 16\:36\:41 +0100")
- References: <kgiprh6kji3.fsf@komarr.gre.hp.com> <20090225171552.22b4c148@sbs173> <20090225164927.GA5148@usha.takhisis.invalid> <kgir61mfnzs.fsf@komarr.gre.hp.com> <20090226081423.GB12501@usha.takhisis.invalid> <kgivdqxe66a.fsf@komarr.gre.hp.com> <20090226153641.GA10523@usha.takhisis.invalid>
Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:
> ... now it is only the two of us which needs to stop talking and start
> proposing patches as needed :-)
Before patches, I've created a page on Debian wiki to better articulate the
proposal:
http://wiki.debian.org/PackageConfigUpgrade
I'll update this page regularly. I'll follow the rough plan mentioned
in this page. I'll send patches on this list as soon as I have something
ready.
All the best
--
Dominique Dumont
"Delivering successful solutions requires giving people what they
need, not what they want." Kurt Bittner
irc:
domidumont at irc.freenode.net
ddumont at irc.debian.org
Reply to: