Re: Requirement for a “proper manpage” for every command

[Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com>]

Ben Finney wrote:
> Wording and tone aside, is that expectation reasonable?
Yes.
>  What course of
> action is open to a user of the package, with a maintainer who has
> made it plain they're not interested in following (this part of)
> policy?
>   
There's nothing direct you can do as user. As a packager, you could 
propose adopting the package if the current maintainer is incompetent.
As a user, you'd have to report a bug each time the manual becomes 
incorrect due to lack of care.