hiya, On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:20:44AM +0100, David Paleino wrote: > On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:17:42 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > * Jonny Lamb [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:41:46 +0000]: > > > > > Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec0c > > > > I don't know what your further plans of versioning are for Git snapshot > > (incrementing the micro release number?), but I thought I'd point out > > that SHA1 are not sensibly sortable, just in case. > > Probably something like 0.0.0+git<num>~<sha> would work? Where <num> is > incremented at each snapshot packaging. when i've had to do this in the past i think i did something like <vers>~<YYYYMMDD>.git.<sha>. this way you get lots of relevant info, the fact that it's a prerelease of <vers>, the date the snapshot was taken, the fact that it's a git snapshot, and the sha sum. and of course it's sortable. also why 0.0.0, and not just 0? just makes it unnecessarily longer imho... sean
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature