[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#538022: PAGER as a pipeline

Hi Colin,

why did you reassign 538022 to general? From reading "If we want to extend 
PAGER in general, then I'm willing to revisit this." in  
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=149;bug=538022 I understand 
you want the projects opinion on whether man should implement this? If I got 
that correctly, I think  the bug should be reassigned to man - and the 
project can still discuss this.

Else, please explain what's the general bug to track here.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: