#include <hallo.h> * Ben Hutchings [Sun, Dec 20 2009, 02:26:53AM]: > On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 11:17 +1030, Ron wrote: > [...] > > I don't understand the pushback I'm getting on this. The bloat that was > > already added _far_ outweighs the little extra it needs to fix it, and > > that's before we save on pruning away libgdb. I don't think I'd be going > > out on a limb to suggest this will be of benefit to far more people than > > the number who'll need python scripts to use gdb. Am I? > > > > Really, what am I missing here? > > What you're missing is that gdb's scripting facilities were pathetic, > and Python integration finally fixes that. And people who don't care shouldn't be forced against their will. Why don't we provide a gdb-tiny package, in the same fashion as vim-tiny? Or is the python support that much hardcoded into gdb source now that it can never separated? Regards, Eduard.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature