[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GDM, getty and VTs

On Tue,24.Nov.09, 15:26:33, Jon Dowland wrote:
> What I would like to see is something like the following.
> I've no idea whether it is achievable technically, but I'd
> be interested to know what others thought.
> * the display manager gets the first VT. If there is no 
>   display manager configured, a TTY is assigned instead.
>   (really, in the absence of an [xkg]dm, a TTY is treated
>   as a display manager).


> * for one release cycle, I would statically allocate a
>   localized message to VT7, indicating the changed behaviour

Where should a second (and third, fourth...) X instance reside, one 
created by the switch-user functionality for example?

Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: