On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 19:29 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > I'm not asserting that this problem is *not* significant, I simply don't > know - and am interested in knowing if anyone has more data on this beyond > some four-year-old anecdotes. Certainly, Debian with its wider range of > ports is more likely to run into problems because of this than Ubuntu, and > so will need to be fairly cautious. I'd have assumed that ports will have no effect on this: Debian only uploads one binary arch (from the maintainer) anyway :- only builds on that arch will be directly affected except in the case of a build failure that the maintainer could have caught locally. -Rob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part