Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG (take 2)
* Mike Hommey:
> Stupid question: with this wording of the AGPL, who, in his right mind,
> will be licensing a DNS or POP server under this license ? (Except maybe
> someone who didn't read it)
Someone might take a GPLv3 project, make enhancements to it, publish
the combination under the AGPL, and charge for the right not to
distribute the source code.
Of course, this is not a problem for Debian. But authors licensing
software under the GPL version 3 (or version 2 or later), might expect
that it is a strong copyleft. It is not.