Re: Lintian based autorejects

To: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Lintian based autorejects
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:01:31 -0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 54FE26CE08604248BAA3A2B407497716@internal.avcosystems.com>
References: <87skd5extc.fsf@delenn.ganneff.de> <[🔎] 20091027145735.GA24901@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk> <[🔎] 20091028032118.GB4396@sys11.in.vpac.org>

Brian May wrote:

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:57:35PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
    - statically-linked-binary
This is not always a bug. e.g. dar-static is supposed to be staticallylinked!

Lintian intentionally doesn't warn about binaries with names ending -static,hence the non-appearance of dar-static onhttp://lintian.debian.org/tags/statically-linked-binary.html


Cheers,

Adam

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Lintian based autorejects
  - From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Re: Lintian based autorejects
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.debian.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Huge lag between submitting a bug and replies
Next by Date: Re: texi2html -split_chapter destination changed
Previous by thread: Re: Lintian based autorejects
Next by thread: Re: Lintian based autorejects
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread