Re: Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content
> Russ Allbery schrieb:
> > The package description strongly implies that gnaughty works only
> > with one specific porn index or download service, which is
> > presumably non-free. If this is not the case, the proposed package
> > description should be fixed.
> Seems like the description has to be fixed, there is no pay-only
> content and it has included some more download sources, not only one
Wow, when did 'non-free' and 'pay-only' become synonymous? Is this
debian-devel, or ZDnet?