Re: Bug#550817: ITP: gitolite -- standalone, souped-up version of gitosis
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Stefano Zacchiroli <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2009-10-13 11:03:00 CEST]:
> > What if one has no idea of what "gitosis" is? For such a person, the
> > above description will be close to meaningless. I suggest expanding in a
> > couple of words what gitosis is, turning the reference to it as
> > something like "similar to gitosis".
> Let me repeat my response that I sent already to the bugreport:
> | Of course it isn't [the final version of the description]; it's just
> | the short blurb that can be seen on the upstream website about it.
> | Having a full fledged description at ITP stage means that one already
> | started at working on the package - and given that an ITP is meant to
> | be there so that we don't duplicate work and /personally/ the package
> | description is something that I rather *not* think as first of when
> | starting to work on a package sending out the ITP with something
> | final package description is backwards, counter-productive and
> | anachronistic to me. :)
> But for a quick roundup: gitosis is offering (key-based) ssh access
> with ACLs to a git repository, including broken down to even branch
> level based ACLs.
> So long! :)
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com