-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Thomas Goirand skrev:
>> Surely you are aware of the huge controversy around Ext JS licensing.
> Hell, I missed it.
Oh well :-)
> This doesn't appear at all on the license.txt. Do you
> think I could still package it for the non-free archive?
I don't know. But your first remark illustrates one problem with their
licensing policies - they are simply unclear and ambiguous, and by now
one must assume that it is intentional.
For example it is not clear what it means to license something under GPL
"with strings attached". It seems (to me) that their interpretation is
that users who get Ext under the GPL will *not* be able to redistribute
it freely, likewise under the GPL. (In fact that would circumvent their
whole "dual-licensing" policy.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----