[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: btrfs

On mer, 2009-10-07 at 14:12 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> I expect that the kernel team tends to be more careful about uploads to 
> Unstable than most package maintainers due to the scope of damage that a bad 
> kernel can cause.  But would it be possible to have an upload of a newer 
> kernel for people who want to test btrfs?  I'm assuming that every system 
> that runs btrfs is at risk of losing all it's data anyway so running an 
> experimental kernel isn't going to make things any riskier.

Is 2.6.31 enoiugh?

corsac@hidalgo: apt-cache search linux-image-2.6.31
linux-headers-2.6.31-trunk-amd64 - Header files for Linux 2.6.31-trunk-amd64
linux-image-2.6.31-trunk-amd64 - Linux 2.6.31 image on AMD64
corsac@hidalgo: apt-cache madison linux-image-2.6.31-trunk-amd64
linux-image-2.6.31-trunk-amd64 | 2.6.31-1~experimental.1 | http://ftp.fr.debian.org experimental/main Packages
 linux-2.6 | 2.6.31-1~experimental.1 | http://ftp.fr.debian.org experimental/main Sources



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: