Hi, I agree with Charles: this is unncessary, unproductive busy-work. On the other hand, Section 10.4 says only "the script name should not include an extension". So you can leave the extension for compatibility with the rest of the world. It is a bug, but Section 1.1 says: Non-conformance with guidelines denoted by should (or recommended) will generally be considered a bug, but will not necessarily render a package unsuitable for distribution. -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature