Re: OK to reduce priority of update-inetd to optional?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Serafeim Zanikolas schrieb:
> Is it OK to reduce update-inetd's priority to optional, to agree with the
> archive admin's override? (It should be, as all its rdepends are at most
> It should be Priority: standard only if people use it interactively, and
> expect it to be part of a standard installation (but I'm guessing that this
> isn't common).
> update-inetd_4.32_all.deb: package says priority is important, override says optional.
In my opinion (and I sponsored this upload) it is okay. In my opinion
there is no need that this packages has a bigger importance than
optional, this should fit for this package.
You may report this against ftp.debian.org.
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----