On måndagen den 24 augusti 2009, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2009-08-23 Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@debian.org> wrote: > > On lördagen den 22 augusti 2009, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > >> Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@debian.org> writes: > >>> * Self-contained, no dependencies (except libc), thanks to code > >>> included from the PolarSSL project. > >> > >> From a Debian perspective, that's a policy violation, not a feature! > >> > >> Please arrange for it to use an external PolarSSL installation. > > > > I know and agree and will talk to Tom about this. PolarSSL currently only > > provides a static library however, which is also not good. > > I am somehow also not happy with a situation where any given exim > installation would end linked dynamically (indirectly) against at least > two full blown ssl libraries (OpenSSL or GnuTLS for STARTTLS, polarssl > for DKIM). > > On a sidenote, is the cause for this ITP just exim or is general > interest in this library? Primarily for Exim. Also because I already maintain a couple of DKIM-related packages. Did you want it? -- Magnus Holmgren holmgren@debian.org Debian Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.