[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#544035: RFH: stlport5.2 -- STLport C++ class library


On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:33:44PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Can anyone explain if/why stlport is still useful?  Given the low
> popcon, and small number of rdepends, could this be a candidate for
> removal?

libstlport4.6 has to be kept on i386 for ABI issues. For the rest[1],
yes I agree. unless there's some other non-obvious need for it



[1] stlport5.1 doesn't even have any rdep and stlport5.2 only two
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
   `-   Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70

Reply to: