Re: Bug#544035: RFH: stlport5.2 -- STLport C++ class library
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:33:44PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Can anyone explain if/why stlport is still useful? Given the low
> popcon, and small number of rdepends, could this be a candidate for
> removal?
libstlport4.6 has to be kept on i386 for ABI issues. For the rest[1],
yes I agree. unless there's some other non-obvious need for it
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
[1] stlport5.1 doesn't even have any rdep and stlport5.2 only two
(kawari8/libnel0)
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
`- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70
Reply to: