Re: RFC: DEP-3: Patch Tagging Guidelines
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 06:48:22AM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
[..snip..]
> At least with topgit, patch branches are meant to be pushed and
> pulled, and use merge rather than rebase for just this reason. This
> makes the history ugly, but does facilitate the kind of collaboration
> James alluded to. I lost track of what the global point of this
Sure. I think I do understand what James is talking about. It's
basically a matter of taste if you rebase patch branches or use topgit -
both have their up and downsides.
Cheers,
-- Guido
Reply to: