[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC round 3: DEP-3: Patch Tagging Guidelines

Jon Dowland <jon+debian-devel@alcopop.org> writes:

> One thing I would like to see patch metadata help facilitate is patch
> review. At the moment the "Reviewed-by" header proposed would allow a
> tool to ensure at least two sets of eyeballs had seen a patch;
> however, patches can go stale. I think some chronological information
> is needed alongside the review. I propose a "Last-Reviewed" header to
> capture this information.

(Psst: the patch has exactly one header, structured into multiple
fields. Just like an RFC2822 email message or an HTTP response.)

 \       “I bought some powdered water, but I don't know what to add.” |
  `\                                                    —Steven Wright |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

Attachment: pgpE0kkcxi1q5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: