cc vs gcc
There is a bit of discussion in bug #487546 about whether using cc or gcc as
the compiler is appropriate.
Particular questions:
* Are Debian packages supposed to be built by default using /usr/bin/gcc (or
whatever gcc is first in the path)? Or is it valid to use cc?
* What interface is the "cc" alternative offering? Is it a GCC-compatible
compiler, or a POSIX/SUS-compatible compiler?
Currently, packages using cdbs will usually end up using CC=cc as their
compiler, which is typically gcc, but doesn't have to. The submitter of the
bug isn't really telling what exactly he is doing, but I guess it's
conceivable to have another compiler than gcc in use, at least unless there is
a ruling to the contrary on the above questions.
Comments?
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cc vs gcc
- From: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>