On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 22:44 -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > Which implementation could we reasonably expect most people to understand (to > include people not knowledgeable with shell escaping)? For example, consider > what the two fields may mean to a Windows user. I think the style I proposed is most easily read because it is precisely the same style used when giving a list of files via your shell. $ ls a\ b c d\ e\ f g.* People who haven't used a unix shell will encounter many issues packaging for Debian, as shell quoting and escaping are common through the packaging system. -Rob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part