Re: Bug#531221: okular: Arbitrarily enforces DRM
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#531221: okular: Arbitrarily enforces DRM
- From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:16:43 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090604131642.GA24428@cajita.gateway.2wire.net>
- In-reply-to: <20090531112756.GC22281@connexer.com>
- References: <20090531000911.18496.98261.reportbug@katherina.lan.complete.org> <200905310330.39099.pino@kde.org> <20090531013840.GA16509@bongo.bofh.it> <200905301854.57447.lftabera@yahoo.es> <4A21EE14.3020601@complete.org> <20090531100036.GA22281@connexer.com> <20090531111107.GA15270@enricozini.org> <20090531112756.GC22281@connexer.com>
Roberto C. Sánchez dijo [Sun, May 31, 2009 at 07:27:56AM -0400]:
> Here is behavior that I consider to be equally sane:
>
> $ su -
> Password:
> # echo ciao >/tmp/foo
> # chmod -w /tmp/foo
> # exit
> logout
> $ vim /tmp/foo
> :w -> E45: 'readonly' option is set (add ! to override)
> :w! -> "/tmp/foo" E212: Can't open file for writing
> (…)
> In reality, what I am having trouble with is, how these two
> scenarios are different:
>
> 1. Someone produces a PDF with certain DRM restrictions. The user
> decides that he does not like the restrictions and so looks to
> circumvent them.
>
> 2. A user or sysadmin produces a file and removes certain access (read
> and/or write) for other users. The user decides that he does not like
> the restrictions and so looks to circumvent them.
Strong difference here, given we are talking about a Unixish system:
In case 1, all of the bits in question belong to the same user. In
case 2, some of the bits belong to a special user who is in charge of
running the machine.
--
Gunnar Wolf - gwolf@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
Reply to: