Hello list (I've put a couple of people in Bcc to try to get more feedback), I'm working on integrating a PAM module into nss-ldapd and am looking for input on this. The PAM module was kindly provided by Howard Chu from the OpenLDAP project but I'm still working on the server part. (more info on nss-ldapd: http://packages.debian.org/nss-ldapd) With this new functionality I'm planning to generate three binary packages (instead of the now one): libnss-ldapd (the NSS module), libpam-ldapd (the PAM module) and nslcd (the daemon). The reason for this split is that some users may want to stick with the other PAM module. Also the OpenLDAP people are working on an overlay that could replace the nslcd part (but it's up to the OpenLDAP maintainers if they want to provide such a package). Also, I'm looking for people who are willing to spend some time on nss-ldapd. I could use some help with the PAM packaging part, I know libpam-runtime was changed recently so if anyone can help to get the the PAM packaging into shape that would be great. Since nss-ldapd seems to be used more often now, having a co-maintainer for the package would really help. There is still enough development work to be done but also packaging work with the upcoming split. Another important part where I would really welcome suggestions is a better name for the software. I've seen some confusion over the current name (people not noticing the d at the end) and with the integration of PAM functionality the name no longer covers the functionality. Current work on integrating the PAM functionality can be tracked here: http://arthurenhella.demon.nl/svn/nss-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd/ http://arthurenhella.demon.nl/viewvc/nss-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd/ Any comments and suggestions are very much appreciated. Thanks. -- -- arthur - adejong@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part