On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 21:41 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:36:50AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > no point in posting that to devel announce. > > this work is pointless and has no review at all by the debian kernel team. > > Hi Max, > > At the risk of repeating myself, I'd like to take the opportunity to thank > you for the very noticeable progress in removing non-free blobs from the sid > version of linux-2.6. Looking at the bugs I reported, it appears that all > of them have been fixed except #494119, I kind of agree with this bug as the comment at the top of the file about how to regenerate it strongly implies that it is not the preferred form for modification. > #494120 and #494122. [...] I disagree with these as the tables in question are easily small enough to be a plausible preferred form for modification. Ben.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part